No black-box scores
Every number traces back to the peer-reviewed method behind it: Coggan and Allen, Banister, Skiba, Seiler. Anything we can’t cite, we don’t claim.
Analysis a coach can argue with.
The serious analytics platforms are powerful and punishing, the polished ones are shallow, and almost none of them show their working. If you can’t interrogate a number you shouldn’t be acting on it, so every number here turns up with its method, its range, and the paper it came from.
What we hold to
Answer what to do today
Most tools report what happened. The harder question is what to do about it this morning, which is why readiness, the plan and current form resolve into one read instead of four dashboards.
The data stays the athlete’s
Tied to their account, stored privately, exportable or deletable whenever they want. We don’t run ad trackers, sell training history, or train a model on anyone’s numbers.
Depth without the wall
The analytical depth of WKO and intervals.icu without the week of study it usually costs. Beginner mode keeps it simple, Pro mode shows everything, and underneath it’s the same engine.
If your coach uses QuikShift
They haven’t handed your training to a machine. The AI here can’t write a plan, can’t override your coach, and can’t say anything it’s unable to back up. It reads your sessions with methods from published sport science rather than from the open internet, and every number in what it writes is checked against your actual data before anyone sees it. Your coach gets the evidence sooner. The judgment stays theirs, and so does the attention.
Who it is for
Coaches who need to see a whole roster clearly without reading every file themselves, and self-coached athletes who want to know why their training’s working. Cyclists, runners and triathletes on one account, with the analysis layer there when it earns its place.