QuikShift

Know who needs you today.

Twenty athletes uploaded something yesterday and you’ve got one morning. Nobody opens twenty files. QuikShift reads each session as it lands, scores load and recovery against that athlete’s own history, and puts whoever’s drifting at the top of the list. Fifteen analyses sit under every name, an AI that’ll explain any of them, and a source under every number. It does the reading. You do the coaching.

$50 a month, ten athletes or a hundred. No per-head fee, and nothing for them to pay.

The QuikShift roster: six athletes, two flagged for a look today, each showing readiness, ramp, ACWR and seven-day load against its normal range.
The roster, sorted by who needs you first.

Pulls from whatever they already train on

  • Strava
  • Garmin
  • intervals.icu
  • TrainingPeaks
  • Wahoo
  • COROS
  • Polar
  • Suunto
  • Zwift
  • Whoop
  • Oura
  • Apple Health
  • Google Fit
  • Fitbit
  • Peloton
  • Hammerhead
  • Stryd
  • Concept2
  • and more each month

Four reads on every athlete, every day

Four measurements, each sitting next to the range it’s normal in for that athlete. Showing you the range is the whole point: it’s what lets you look at one and decide the number’s wrong.

Readiness
HRV, resting heart rate, sleep, and what the athlete says they’ve got that morning, weighed against their own baseline rather than a population average.
Ramp and ACWR
How steeply load is climbing against the last four weeks of it. When a build starts outrunning the base you see it while there’s still room to ease off.
Fitness and form
The Banister model fitted per athlete, so the fitness and fatigue constants come out of their own history instead of a textbook default.
Durability
Whether power and pace hold through the back half of a long session or quietly fall away. Races turn on this and a session average buries it completely.

Then go as deep as the question needs

Open an athlete and the board’s already built: fifteen analyses fitted to their data, each carrying its slope, its fit, its sample size and the paper the method came from. When the relationship isn’t there, the panel tells you. Efficiency factor on this athlete reports p = 0.109 and calls itself stable, because a null result is still a result.

An athlete's analysis board: a plain-language conclusion above training load, eFTP trend, dose-response and efficiency-factor charts, each showing slope, R-squared, p-value and sample size with its source paper.
Every panel carries its slope, its fit, its sample size and the paper behind it.
  • Training load
  • Fitness trend (eFTP)
  • Dose-response
  • Efficiency factor
  • Form & ramp rate
  • Volume & consistency
  • Power variability
  • eFTP projection
  • Anomaly watch
  • Signal scan
  • Ramp rate & ACWR
  • Form (TSB) trend
  • Fitness-form readiness
  • Monotony & strain
  • Fitness momentum

AI that does the reading, not the coaching

It won’t coach for you. What it does is get you to the evidence faster, so the call you make at the end of it is better informed than it would’ve been after opening files one at a time.

Explains any graph
Drop the Brain on a chart and it reads that chart for that athlete: what the slope means for them, and whether the fit’s strong enough to act on yet.
Builds the graph you asked for
Describe a relationship you want to see and it assembles that view out of the athlete’s data, instead of making you hunt for it among presets.
Answers questions in context
Ask about an athlete and the whole computed analysis is already in front of it. You never paste numbers in or explain again who you mean.
The AI Brain toolbar above a written conclusion reading: the athlete is responding well, fitness is rising in step with load, hold the current structure and keep an eye on durability and form.
The Brain, and the read it wrote from the numbers underneath it.

The AI only gets to describe what was measured

Most AI training tools answer from whatever they read on the open web. This one has no such licence. The analysis engine computes the numbers first, using the methods on the science page, and the model only gets to put those numbers into sentences.

Then every figure in the write-up is checked back against the computed result. A sentence carrying a number the engine never produced gets dropped before it reaches you. It won’t plan a season, overrule you, or fill a gap with a guess.

Read how the checking works

No number without a source

Every metric names the method it comes from, and every method links to the paper. The library holds 55 published sources and was last reviewed in May 2026.

  • Coggan & Allen (2010)
  • Monod & Scherrer (1965)
  • Skiba et al. (2012)
  • Banister (TRIMP)
  • Seiler (intensity distribution)
  • Minetti et al. (2002)
Browse the science library

Pricing

One price to coach, whatever the size of your roster. Your athletes never see a bill.

Free

$0 / always

The whole platform. Every metric, every integration.

Create an account
  • All integrations
  • Per-activity analysis
  • Power-duration and W′ balance
  • Time in zone
  • Training calendar
  • Wellness and readiness

Pro

$12 / per month

For training yourself. Adds the analysis layer to your own data.

Go Pro
  • Everything in Free
  • Session analysis and notes
  • A read on today’s session
  • Trend and durability narration
  • New features first

Training on your own?

The same analysis, pointed at one athlete. Connect a service and read your own sessions the way a coach would read them. Free to start, and the depth’s there when you want it.

Open your roster tomorrow and already know.

Start coaching